Skip to main content

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: garthus Date: Mar 19, 2010 8:11pm
Forum: texts Subject: Re: NOT_IN_COPYRIGHT

Ohme,

Actually over 90% of all books published between 1923 and 1 March 1989. We either never copyrighted or never had their copyrights renewed in a timely fashion as per Rule 6 of the US Copyright Statutes. In fact you will find that many times a copyright notice was placed on a work, but a registration was never filed. The creator had 1 year to file the registration after the work was published with a copyright notice attached, up until before 1964. After 1964 the rules get more complicated, essentially copyright filings were not required if a notice was attached. Without registration notice, creator retains rites but has no civil remedy if they file suit. This was between 1964 and 1 March 1989.

Copyright laws like most legislation passed by governments is purposefully obfuscated to make work for bottom-feeding politicians, lawyers and associated bureaucratic scum. We can really throw a monkey wrench into their game by posting as much as we can under the Creative Commons License. Generally one can rest assured that most books published in the above-mentioned time periods are in the Public Domain. Of course the original creators of the legislation did not conceive that most writers in the past were more concerned about creating works than in becoming part of the corrupt Corporate-Government grabocracy which passes for our government and unfortunately most of our brain-dead culture today.

Gerry

Gerard Arthus
Systems Administrator:
Long Island library Resources Council
627 N. Sunrise Service Road
Medford, New York
USA 11713
Office: 631-675-1570 ext 209
Fax: 631-675-1573
Home: 631-289-7565
Cell: 631-335-5250

Professor:
Graduate Computer Science/Engineering Management Program
Long Island University/CW Post Campus
720 Northern Boulevard
Brookville, New York
11548-1300

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: ohme Date: Mar 20, 2010 3:35pm
Forum: texts Subject: Re: NOT_IN_COPYRIGHT

Thanks!

I guess it would be nice if a resource existed that listed copyrights that were *not* renewed. It's easier to prove that that something happened than to prove it didn't. However compiling such a resource would be a monumental task...